Skip to main content

Protection of Constitutional Law

Study Course Description

Course Description Statuss:Approved
Course Description Version:6.00
Study Course Accepted:02.08.2024 13:23:28
Study Course Information
Course Code:JF_412LQF level:Level 7
Credit Points:2.00ECTS:3.00
Branch of Science:LawTarget Audience:Juridical Science
Study Course Supervisor
Course Supervisor:Uldis Ķinis
Study Course Implementer
Structural Unit:Faculty of Social Sciences
The Head of Structural Unit:
Contacts:Dzirciema street 16, Rīga, szfatrsu[pnkts]lv
Study Course Planning
Full-Time - Semester No.1
Lectures (count)6Lecture Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Lectures12
Classes (count)6Class Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Classes12
Total Contact Hours24
Part-Time - Semester No.1
Lectures (count)4Lecture Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Lectures8
Classes (count)2Class Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Classes4
Total Contact Hours12
Study course description
Preliminary Knowledge:
Professional Bachelor’s degree in Law. In particular – knowledge on the legal theory, legal methods, philosophy of law, administrative and constitutional law, administrative process.
Objective:
To improve students' knowledge of the protection of constitutional rights. The course will address issues related to the interpretation of the Satversme and procedural aspects of the protection of constitutional rights deriving from the Satversme, the Constitutional Court Law and the Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court. In the practical part of the course, students, both individually and in teams, must be able to resolve case studies related to the infringement of fundamental rights and must prepare, submit and evaluate a constitutional complaint.
Topic Layout (Full-Time)
No.TopicType of ImplementationNumberVenue
1Current developments in Constitutional LawLectures2.00auditorium
2The role of the Constitutional court in the protection of constitutional rightsLectures2.00auditorium
3Constitutional complaint – an effective mean of protection of fundamental rightsLectures2.00auditorium
4Seminars. Case studies. Team workClasses6.00auditorium
Topic Layout (Part-Time)
No.TopicType of ImplementationNumberVenue
1Current developments in Constitutional LawLectures1.00auditorium
2The role of the Constitutional court in the protection of constitutional rightsLectures1.00auditorium
3Constitutional complaint – an effective mean of protection of fundamental rightsLectures2.00auditorium
4Seminars. Case studies. Team workClasses2.00auditorium
Assessment
Unaided Work:
A student must prepare and submit a constitutional complaint (application)
Assessment Criteria:
The student's rating is expressed in %. For the practical part of the course (seminars, two tests, report - constitutional complaint), the student can get up to 50% of the final grade of the course. Work in seminars – 15%; for each test – 10%; report – constitutional complaint – 25% (of which – 5% review); exam – 50%. Students who have not passed all tests with a grade of at least 50% will not be allowed to take the exam. In order to pass the exam and get a positive final grade, students must get at least 40% in the theoretical and practical part of the exam.
Final Examination (Full-Time):Exam (Written)
Final Examination (Part-Time):Exam (Written)
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge:Students are able to demonstrate their understanding and orient themselves in current issues of legal regulation in the field of constitutional procedure law.
Skills:Students can independently analyze and understand the interpretation of the norms of the Constitution, analyze the process of constitutional control and prepare a constitutional complaint, and implement the methodology that the Constitutional Court applies in its practice.
Competencies:Students are able to show understanding and provide a critical assessment of what constitutes an infringement of fundamental rights. Able to apply regulatory acts corresponding to the specifics of constitutional law, justify decisions and, if necessary, perform additional analysis.
Bibliography
No.Reference
Required Reading
1Jaunākās judikatūras atziņas
2Jānis Neimanis. Satversmes tiesas procesa tiesības. Tiesu nanu aģentūra, 2019
3A. Rodiņa. Konstitucionālās sūdzības teorija un prakse Latvijā. Rīga “Latvijas vēstnesis”, 2009
4J. Pleps. “Satversmes iztulkošana”. Rīga, "Latvijas vēstnesis”, 2012
Additional Reading
1Autoru kolektīvs. Vispārējie tiesību principi: tiesdiskā drošība un paļāvība. Rīga, TNA, 2017
2Sanita Osipova. Nācija, valoda, tiesiska valsts, ceļā uz rītdienu. Rīga, TNA, 2020
3Cilvēktiesības pasaulē un Latvijā. Inetas Ziemeles redakcijā, Otrais papildināais izdevums. Tiesu namu aģentūra, 2021
4Publiskās tiesības. Ievads. Autoru kolektīvs Inetas Ziemeles un Sanitas Osipovas zinātniskajā redakcijā. Rīga, TNA, 2024.
Other Information Sources
1Raksti žurnālos “Jurista vārds” ,“Administratīvā un kriminālā justīcija”, “ Socrates”, kā arī ārvalstu avotos atbilstoši tematikai
2Satversmes tiesas mājas lapā publicētie materiāli