Skip to main content

Academic Workshop

Study Course Description

Course Description Statuss:Approved
Course Description Version:1.00
Study Course Accepted:21.02.2024 08:40:00
Study Course Information
Course Code:SZF_057LQF level:Level 7
Credit Points:2.00ECTS:3.00
Branch of Science:PoliticsTarget Audience:Political Science
Study Course Supervisor
Course Supervisor:Māris Andžāns
Study Course Implementer
Structural Unit:Faculty of Social Sciences
The Head of Structural Unit:
Contacts:Dzirciema street 16, Rīga, szfatrsu[pnkts]lv
Study Course Planning
Full-Time - Semester No.1
Lectures (count)5Lecture Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Lectures10
Classes (count)10Class Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Classes20
Total Contact Hours30
Part-Time - Semester No.1
Lectures (count)5Lecture Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Lectures10
Classes (count)10Class Length (academic hours)2Total Contact Hours of Classes20
Total Contact Hours30
Study course description
Preliminary Knowledge:
General knowledge on international relations and diplomacy, as well as on research methods.
Objective:
To enhance overall students' academic knowledge, skills and competencies in international relations and diplomacy.
Topic Layout (Full-Time)
No.TopicType of ImplementationNumberVenue
1Topical issues of international relations and diplomacyLectures3.00auditorium
Classes5.00auditorium
2Topicalities of international relations research methods and research at largeLectures2.00auditorium
Classes5.00auditorium
Topic Layout (Part-Time)
No.TopicType of ImplementationNumberVenue
1Topical issues of international relations and diplomacyLectures3.00auditorium
Classes5.00auditorium
2Topicalities of international relations research methods and research at largeLectures2.00auditorium
Classes5.00auditorium
Assessment
Unaided Work:
Preparation for workshops according to the guidance provided by the lecturer. In order to evaluate the quality of the study course as a whole, the student must fill out the study course evaluation questionnaire on the Student Portal.
Assessment Criteria:
Activity in workshops and lectures – 30%. Quality of answers in workshops – 70%.
Final Examination (Full-Time):Exam
Final Examination (Part-Time):Exam
Learning Outcomes
Knowledge:Students will carve future scenarios and development of empirical phenomena, based on advanced knowledge acquired in the study course on international relations’ theoretical and methodological aspects and comprehension of empirical phenomena. Students will navigate across the most significant international relations’ issues in current context.
Skills:Students will individually conduct analytical work of large scale, by critically selecting and objectively evaluating sources and arriving at objective and neutral solutions. Students will endeavour in a professional team, that will include leading group work, persuading others on own opinion and motivating others along with coordination of multiple simultaneous tasks. Students will conduct individual work of a large scale when a range of tasks of varying importance and complexity should be performed. Acquired skills will include work planning, task prioritization skills, as well as stress resilience skills.
Competencies:Students will develop and discuss innovative solutions to be used in solving the most important problems of international relations.
Bibliography
No.Reference
Required Reading
1Visa literatūra ir angļu valodā un piemērota gan latviešu, gan angļu plūsmas studentiem
2Kurki, Milja, Wright, Colin. Chapter 1. International Relations and Social Science. In: Tim Dunne, Milja Kurki, Steve Smith (eds). International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2021. Pp. 13-34.
3Blaikie N. Designing social research: the logic of anticipation. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2019.
Additional Reading
1Popper, Karl. The Logic of Scientific Discovery. N.Y.: Routledge, 2002 (published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2005). Pp.3-34.
2Serena Bertogliatti. What is the significance of the fourth debate in the contemporary discipline of IR? Has it, and should it, be transcended? What is the significance of meta-theoretical debates for IR theory and research?